<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Securities Fraud Blawg : by Kansas City Missouri Securities Fraud Lawyer The Kueser Law Firm &#187; Class Action</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.securitiesfraudblawg.com/category/class_action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.securitiesfraudblawg.com</link>
	<description>A Blog Concerning All Things Related to Securities Fraud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:13:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>What Guidance Will SCOTUS Give on the Statute of Limitations in Securities Cases?</title>
		<link>http://www.securitiesfraudblawg.com/what-guidance-will-scotus-give-on-the-statute-of-limitations-in-securities-cases/2009/06/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitiesfraudblawg.com/what-guidance-will-scotus-give-on-the-statute-of-limitations-in-securities-cases/2009/06/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 01:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason M. Kueser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Class Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stockbroker and Financial Adviser Misconduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statute of Limitations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitiesfraudblawg.com/what-guidance-will-scotus-give-on-the-statute-of-limitations-in-securities-cases/2009/06/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent article published on Law.com, Sarah S. Gold and Richard L. Spinogatti conduct a thorough analysis of the issues in In re Merck &#38; Co. Secs. Deriv. &#38; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/ihc/PubArticleIHC.jsp?id=1202431372080" target="_blank" title="Law.com: Revisiting the Limitations Period for Securities Fraud">article</a> published on <a href="http://www.law.com/" target="_blank" title="Law.com">Law.com</a>, Sarah S. Gold and Richard L. Spinogatti conduct a thorough analysis of the issues in <em>In re Merck &amp; Co. Secs. Deriv. &amp; ERISA Litig..</em>, a Third Circuit Court of Appeals case. The Supreme Court granted certiorari in <em>In re Merck</em> to resolve when an investor is on inquiry notice of a potential fraud claim for purposes of determining when the statute of limitaions begins to run..</p>
<p>The authors note that in <em>In re Merck</em>, the Third Circuit held that &#8220;an investor is not on inquiry notice of a potential fraud claim until the investor has knowledge of a possible fraud, including scienter.&#8221; The authors also note that the Ninth Circuit recently came to a similar conclusion in <em>Betz v. Trainer Wortham &amp; Co</em>., for which a certiorari petition is currently pending.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/ihc/PubArticleIHC.jsp?id=1202431372080" target="_blank" title="Law.com">article</a> is a good read for anyone interested in securities fraud litigation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitiesfraudblawg.com/what-guidance-will-scotus-give-on-the-statute-of-limitations-in-securities-cases/2009/06/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
